http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/2542 2026-04-20T15:21:04Z http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/2551 Immigrazione e principio di solidarietà Villani, Ugo 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/2550 Mandato di arresto europeo e protezione dei diritti umani: problemi irrisolti e “incoraggianti” sviluppi giurisprudenziali Panella, Lina The article deals with the problem of the relationship between the European Arrest Warrant and the protection of Human Rights. By the analysis of the most important European Court’s cases-law in this subject, it is possible to note a new sensitivity for human rights. Despite comforting developments, many problems are unresolved and mostly the discretion margin of States is always too large. 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/2549 Us and Them: Restricting EU Citizenship Rights Through the Notion of Social Integration Montaldo, Stefano The article addresses the impact of the concept of social integration on the European Union citizenship regime. Despite the lack of a clear legal definition, integration is gradually becoming a key cross-cutting category of EU law. The degree of integration in the host society influences the intensity of protection granted by EU law, as Member States often resort to forms of integration conditionality to protect their core interests. The analysis contends that recent Court of Justice case law acknowledges the compelling rise of this elusive concept. However, the Court fails to address its intrinsic complexity and does not take into due consideration the impact of its exclusionary effect on the scope of application of Union citizenship rights. 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/2548 Dalla direttiva 2011/95/UE alla proposta di Regolamento qualifiche: quale futuro per la protezione internazionale nell’ordinamento UE? Perrini, Francesca The European Institutions are currently examining a new reform of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS). The reform at stake casts many doubts both with reference to the effectiveness of the measures provided in response to the migration phenomenon, and to the guarantees and the protection of the rights of vulnerable categories of migrants involved. In particular, the article makes a comparison between Directive 2011/95 currently in force and the proposal for a Regulation COM (2016) 466. This comparison shows that if the proposal for a regulation were accepted without amendments, there would be a sensible lowering of the level of guarantees and rights for the beneficiaries of International protection. 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z