http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/2964 2026-04-20T18:59:01Z http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/2975 Meriti e demeriti della cooperazione giudiziaria in materia civile: spunti per ulteriori riflessioni Clerici, Roberta 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/2974 Ultimi sviluppi sull'Organizzazione Internazionale per le Migrazioni: l'ingresso nel sistema delle Nazioni Unite e la proposta di creare una governance euro-mediterranea dei flussi migratori Cadin, Raffaele The complex legal/institutional evolution that has always characterized the International Organization for Migration (IOM) culminated in the recent 2016 agreement on relations with the United Nations that defines this entity as a “non-normative organization” and frames it in the spurious category of “related organizations” to the United Nations system and not in the orthodox one of specialized agencies. In addition to dwelling on these legal concepts of not always easy interpretation, the contribution will nevertheless be directed towards addressing the vexed question of the IOM’s respect for the human rights of migrants and the normative standards designed to protect people who enjoy international protection, also in view of the acquisition by this organization of an important role in the construction of a Euro-Mediterranean governance of migratory flows. 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/2973 Una "procedura di infrazione" anche nel sistema CEDU: similitudini e divergenze rispetto al "modello UE" ex artt. 258-260 TFUE Iermano, Anna This article purports to analyse the “infringement proceedings” ex art. 46, paras. 4-5 ECHR in comparison to the “EU model” ex arts 258-260 TFEU, underlining similarities and divergences between them, in particular in the light of the case Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, that is the first case in which the Committee of Ministers decided to use this procedure against a State – Azerbaijan – that refuses to execute a judgment of the European Court of Human Rights. 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/2972 I cittadini europei inattivi e le condizioni per l'accesso alle prestazioni di assistenza sociale in uno Stato membro ospitante: quale lezione dall'ordinamento USA? Messina, Michele EU migrants’ access to social assistance appears still strongly and incrementally related to the duration of their residency in the host Member State. In the US legal order, the mere bona fide simple residence is sufficient for the access to social assistance at the same conditions of long-term residents. Article 24, paragraph 2, of Directive 38/2004, on the contrary, provides exactly a sort of “durational residency requirement”, which, although unconstitutional in the US, allows EU Member States to refuse access to social assistance to EU citizens according to their time spent in the host state. A simple residence requirement, whereby a mere residence registration would be sufficient to allow immediate access to social benefits, seems necessary also in the EU legal system, in accordance with the principle of non discrimination based on nationality and the principle of solidarity. 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z