<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Culture e Studi del Sociale. Vol. 8, n. 2 (2023)</title>
<link>http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/8726</link>
<description>La Violenza Maschile nelle Relazioni Affettive / Male intimate partner violence</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 10:54:02 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-04-20T10:54:02Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>La Violenza Maschile nelle Relazioni Affettive. Approfondimenti e Prospettive per Contrastare la Violenza di Genere</title>
<link>http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/8736</link>
<description>La Violenza Maschile nelle Relazioni Affettive. Approfondimenti e Prospettive per Contrastare la Violenza di Genere
Moffa, Grazia; Pauncz, Alessandra
The volume aims to explore different aspects of gender-based violence, particularly male intimate  partner  violence,  through  an  intersectional  and  interdisciplinary  approach.  It prompts reflection on the cultural and social norms underlying this violence and highlights men's responsibility to assume accountability for their actions. The primary objective is to encourage critical reflection and foster a sustained commitment tocombatting gender-based violence while promoting a culture of respect and gender equality.
</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/8736</guid>
<dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Valutare per prevenire: la rilevazione del cambiamento negli autori di violenza tra procedure standard e indicatori qualitativi</title>
<link>http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/8735</link>
<description>Valutare per prevenire: la rilevazione del cambiamento negli autori di violenza tra procedure standard e indicatori qualitativi
Demurtas, Pietro; Peroni, Caterina
Concerning the effectiveness of perpetrator programmes, international literature shows am-bivalent results due to evaluation design limitations, suggesting the need to combine research findings with operational knowledge from field practitioners. From this perspective, the pri-ority must be to reflect on the concept of effectiveness itself and how it can be measured and evaluated. At the same time, it seems necessary to adopt a realistic perspective, taking into account the concrete ways in which data and information on the progress and results of the interventions are produced in the programmes. European standards emphasisethe need to adopt a broader definition of success, including the well-being of victimsand changes in perpetrators’attitudes and behaviour. However, this is not always easy to establish in day-to-day practice, precisely because of the limitations of the monitoring procedures adopted. On the basis of the studies carried out at national level, this paper analyses the dissemination of some of the main procedures used in the centres to monitor the intervention, looking in detail at some qualitative indicators that emerged from the interviews conducted with the operators. The analyses carried out are intended to stimulate reflection on the practicability of the different meanings of ‘success’ of the intervention, in the light of the actors’situated knowledge and the ethical issues that have emerged in the recent national debate.
</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/8735</guid>
<dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Come definire un percorso di successo. Valutazione e follow-up della presa in carico degli uomini autori di violenza</title>
<link>http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/8734</link>
<description>Come definire un percorso di successo. Valutazione e follow-up della presa in carico degli uomini autori di violenza
Cannito, Maddalena; Torrioni, Paola Maria
The paper addresses the issue of evaluation and follow-up of interventions of Centers for Authors of Violence (CUAV). Through empirical data, collected in the Piedmont region, through focus groups and interviews with CUAV’s workers, the ways in which thoseworking with perpetrators of violence define a “successful intervention” were explored. What emerges is that evaluation is still at an extremely embryonic stage and not guided by shared and cod-ified tools. This leads to defining success as change of the user/patient assessed by the prac-titioner/psychologist, often without taking into consideration also a collective assessment and a change in gender attitudes and stereotypes. An important finding that emerged from the research is the centrality of the anti-violence network in assessing the effectiveness of the programs; an aspect, however, that still has to be built but increasingly central given the entry of judges and lawyers into the network, following the approval of the so-called Codice Rosso.
</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/8734</guid>
<dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>La riflessione critica sulla maschilità e la pratica sociale maschile anti-patriarcale come risorse per progettare percorsi di contrasto della violenza di genere</title>
<link>http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/8733</link>
<description>La riflessione critica sulla maschilità e la pratica sociale maschile anti-patriarcale come risorse per progettare percorsi di contrasto della violenza di genere
Ciccone, Stefano
To address male violence in relationships it is necessary to understand its roots in the social construction of different masculinities (Connell) and in masculinity as a context and unitary reference (Bourdieu). "Field work" can read the dynamics that leadto violence by tracing violent behavior back to context of meanings that is at its root. The pervasive nature of the phenomenon requires combining the response to the single act with an intervention capable of addressing the shared culture. Interventions with perpetrators of violence today encounter mistrust if not open hostility. There is a fear that accompanying those who have committed violence on a path of awareness will lead to attenuation of social condemnation, legitimate justifications or lead to the reduction of sentences. But relying on the mere repressive response is illusory and regressive. A second suspicion is that their implementation induces the victims to withdraw from the path of escape from violent relationships. A third doubt concerns the effectiveness of methodologies considered indeterminate. without analytical clarification the approaches can be contradictory: assuming a common sense that considers violence as disorder can lead to proposing self-control to men, espousing a "nostalgia" for a lost norm. The reference in the legislation to these paths risks producing distortions in practice, timing and role and purposes. The risk is that the long and complex path of change bends to the legitimate needs of the judicial system, causing the CUAVs to lose autonomy in choosing a cultural approach oriented towards complexity, to more or less consciously assume the role of consultancy bodies of the process.
</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/8733</guid>
<dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
