Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/2973
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-21T13:35:59Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-21T13:35:59Z-
dc.description.abstractThis article purports to analyse the “infringement proceedings” ex art. 46, paras. 4-5 ECHR in comparison to the “EU model” ex arts 258-260 TFEU, underlining similarities and divergences between them, in particular in the light of the case Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, that is the first case in which the Committee of Ministers decided to use this procedure against a State – Azerbaijan – that refuses to execute a judgment of the European Court of Human Rights.it_IT
dc.language.isoitit_IT
dc.identifier.citationIermano, A. "Una "procedura di infrazione" anche nel sistema CEDU: similitudini e divergenze rispetto al "modello UE" ex artt. 258-260 TFUE." Freedom, Security & Justice: European Legal Studies 3 (2018): 26-43it_IT
dc.titleUna "procedura di infrazione" anche nel sistema CEDU: similitudini e divergenze rispetto al "modello UE" ex artt. 258-260 TFUEit_IT
dc.sourceUniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneoit_IT
dc.contributor.authorIermano, Anna-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10556/2973-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.26321/A.IERMANO.03.2018.03-
dc.typeJournal Articleit_IT
dc.format.extentP. 26-43it_IT
dc.identifier.issn2532-2079it_IT
dc.subjectInfringement proceedingsit_IT
dc.subjectArts. 258-260 TFEUit_IT
dc.subjectArt. 25, paras. 4-5 ECHRit_IT
dc.subjectImplementation judgmentsit_IT
dc.subjectMammadov caseit_IT
Appears in Collections:Freedom, Security & Justice: European Legal Studies (2018), n.3

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FSJ.2018.III.Iermano.3.pdfFSJ.2018.III-Michele-Messina.41,13 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.