Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/3758
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-25T08:53:20Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-25T08:53:20Z-
dc.description.abstractDue to the irregularity of the appeal, in identifying guilty profiles, the decision in question, declares the latter to be inadmissible and orders the appellant, to pay not only the relevant legal costs, but also an additional sum into the penalty fund. Ultimately, this is the real penalty imposed, considering that Art. 660 of the Italian Code of Criminal Procedure has conspicuous limits of effectiveness that even cast doubt on its retention in the Italian Code of Criminal Procedure.it_IT
dc.language.isoitit_IT
dc.identifier.citationTelesca, M. "Art. 660 c.p.: la dubbia efficacia della penalizzazione delle microviolazioni. Osservazioni sulla pronuncia n. 35718/2018 della Corte di Cassazione." Iura & Legal Systems 2018, E (3): 14-21.it_IT
dc.titleArt. 660 c.p.: la dubbia efficacia della penalizzazione delle microviolazioni. Osservazioni sulla pronuncia n. 35718/2018 della Corte di Cassazioneit_IT
dc.sourceUniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneoit_IT
dc.contributor.authorTelesca, Mariangela-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.urihttp://elea.unisa.it:8080/xmlui/handle/10556/3758-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.14273/unisa-1980-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.rivistagiuridica.unisa.it/indexit_IT
dc.typeJournal Articleit_IT
dc.format.extentP. 14-21it_IT
dc.identifier.issn2385-2445it_IT
Appears in Collections:Iura & Legal Systems. Volume 5 (Gennaio - Dicembre 2018)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Iura & Legal Systems 2018, E (3), 14-21.pdfIura & Legal Systems 2018, E (3): 14-21423.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.