Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/5591
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-24T12:21:52Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-24T12:21:52Z-
dc.description.abstractThe article compares C. 11.(7)6 and Cod. Th. 10.19 with the aim of highlighting the method and the logics used by Justinian’s Compilers in reordering the mining legislation coming from the Codex Theodosianus. By examining the provisions accepted or rejected in the Justinian’s Code, the research shows that the careful selection and amendment of the laws coming from Cod. Th. 10.19 preformed by the Justinian’s Compilers took primarily in account the need to remove interpretive doubts in order to better safeguard the specific interests involved in the mining law.it_IT
dc.language.isoitit_IT
dc.identifier.citationCherchi, A. “I compilatori al lavoro sul Codex. Confronto tra c. 11.7(6) e il suo corrispondente Teodosiano.” Iura and Legal Systems VII. 2020/2, B (1): 1-18.it_IT
dc.titleI compilatori al lavoro sul Codex. Confronto tra c. 11.7(6) e il suo corrispondente Teodosianoit_IT
dc.sourceUniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneoit_IT
dc.contributor.authorCherchi, Alice-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttp://elea.unisa.it:8080/xmlui/handle/10556/5591-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.14273/unisa-3702-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.rivistagiuridica.unisa.it/indexit_IT
dc.typeJournal Articleit_IT
dc.format.extentP. 1-18it_IT
dc.identifier.issn2385-2445it_IT
Appears in Collections:Iura & Legal Systems. Volume 7, n. 2 (Aprile - Giugno 2020)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Iura & Legal Systems. Volume 7, n. 2 (Aprile - Giugno 2020).pdfIura & Legal Systems. Volume 7, n. 2 (Aprile - Giugno 2020)679,05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.