Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/8079
Record completo di tutti i metadati
Campo DCValoreLingua
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-11T07:35:17Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-11T07:35:17Z-
dc.description.abstractThe interplay between formal return procedures under Directive 2008/115 and readmissions based on bilateral inter se treaties unveils the Member States' recurrent ambition of disposing of irregular migrants quickly and through minimum formalities. Over the last decade, with the line of cases originated with Affum and developed further by Arib and ADDE, the Court of Justice has maintained that the Member States cannot exercise their reserved powers on readmissions to reduce or circumvent the guarantees provided by Directive 2008/115. In this context, the recent reform of the Schengen Borders Code provides further food for thought, as it introduces a new voluntary transfer procedure aimed at replacing traditional readmissions and to place them under the umbrella of EU law. The proposed analysis addresses this normative development in the light of the case law of the Court of Justice. While discussing the continuing topicality of the Court’s position, the article briefly highlights the inherent potential of the revised Schengen Borders Code and the legal and operational knots ahead.it_IT
dc.language.isoenit_IT
dc.rightsCC BY-SAit_IT
dc.relation.ispartofjournalFreedom, Security & Justice: European Legal Studiesit_IT
dc.identifier.citationMontaldo, S., Kelch, V., Mailand, C., & Poncini, S.” The past and the future of readmissions in the EU: From the AFFUM, ARIB and ADDE case law to the reform of the Schengen Borders Code” Freedom, Security & Justice: European Legal Studies 3 (2024): 188-204it_IT
dc.titleMontaldo, S., Kelch, V., Mailand, C., & Poncini, S.” The past and the future of readmissions in the EU: From the AFFUM, ARIB and ADDE case law to the reform of the Schengen Borders Code” Freedom, Security & Justice: European Legal Studies 3 (2024): 188-204it_IT
dc.sourceUniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneoit_IT
dc.contributor.authorMontaldo, Stefano-
dc.contributor.authorKelch, Verus-
dc.contributor.authorMailand, Connor-
dc.contributor.authorPoncini, Simone-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.fsjeurostudies.eu/files/FSJ.3.2024.9.MONTALDOetal.pdfit_IT
dc.identifier.urihttp://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/8079-
dc.typeJournal Articleit_IT
dc.format.extentP. 188-204it_IT
dc.identifier.doi10.26321/S.MONTALDO.V.KELCH.C.MAILAND.S.PONCINI.03.2024.09it_IT
dc.identifier.issn2532-2079it_IT
dc.subjectReadmissionit_IT
dc.subjectReturn procedureit_IT
dc.subjectBilateral agreementsit_IT
dc.subjectSchengen Borders Codeit_IT
dc.subjectTransfer procedureit_IT
È visualizzato nelle collezioni:prova

File in questo documento:
File Descrizione DimensioniFormato 
FSJ.3.2024.9.MONTALDOetal.pdfFSJ.3.2024.9.MONTALDOetal.818,36 kBAdobe PDFVisualizza/apri


Tutti i documenti archiviati in DSpace sono protetti da copyright. Tutti i diritti riservati.