<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Freedom, Security &amp; Justice: European Legal Studies (2022), n.3</title>
<link>http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/6299</link>
<description/>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:28:18 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-04-20T13:28:18Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>In tema di immunità dello Stato dalla giurisdizione: il complesso bilanciamento tra tutela dei diritti della persona e prerogative della Santa Sede</title>
<link>http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/6311</link>
<description>In tema di immunità dello Stato dalla giurisdizione: il complesso bilanciamento tra tutela dei diritti della persona e prerogative della Santa Sede
Cantoni, Silvia
The possibility for the individual to bring a claim before a judge finds in the rule on sovereign immunity of States a limit established by customary law, that operates even when the person is a victim of serious human rights violations. This is the context in which the practice relating to claims against the Holy See by victims of a heinouscrime, such as paedophilia by Catholic priests, has to be analysed. A recent judgement of the European Court of Human Rights confirms that the right of access to a court, which is a part of the right to a fair trial, must not yet be conceived as an absolute right even in the context of European Convention on Human Rights.; La possibilità per l’individuo di adire un giudice trova nella norma a garanzia dell’immunità sovrana dello Stato un limite stabilito dal diritto consuetudinario che opera anche quando la persona sia vittima di gravissime violazioni di diritti umani. In tale quadro deve essere analizzata la prassi in materia di ricorsi di vittime di un crimine odioso, quale è la pedofilia da parte di preti cattolici, contro la Santa Sede. Una recente sentenza della Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo conferma che il diritto d’accesso ad un tribunale, elemento del diritto ad un equo processo, non deve ancora oggi essere concepito come un diritto assoluto neppure nell’ambito della Convenzione europea dei diritti dell’uomo.
</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/6311</guid>
<dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The European Union External Action, Administrative Function and Human Rights Protection under the Lens of the EU Ombudsman and a Recent Strategic Initiative</title>
<link>http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/6310</link>
<description>The European Union External Action, Administrative Function and Human Rights Protection under the Lens of the EU Ombudsman and a Recent Strategic Initiative
Martines, Francesca
This paper examines the increasingly active role of the European
Ombudsman in ascertaining by what procedures and instruments the European Union
contributes to the protection of human rights in its external action. After an overview
of the European Ombudsman’s competencies and activities concerning the
administrative function of EU institutions, this article discusses the context and scope
of a recent European Ombudsman’s strategic initiative on the incorporation of human
rights clauses – and other human rights tools – in EU international trade agreements
</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/6310</guid>
<dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Libertà di espressione e tutela della dignità delle giornaliste: il contrasto all’online sexist hate speech nello spazio digitale europeo</title>
<link>http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/6309</link>
<description>Libertà di espressione e tutela della dignità delle giornaliste: il contrasto all’online sexist hate speech nello spazio digitale europeo
Morini, Claudia
The impact of technological innovation on freedom of expression – also
due to the massive and rapid spread of social media – leads to a renewed reflection
on the possible limits and balances with other rights to which this right may be
subject. In particular, a drift of this freedom is today represented by the phenomenon
of online sexist hate speech against women journalists, which primarily damagestheir
dignity, besides causing a worrying chilling effect on their freedom of expression.
The present work, therefore, reconstructs the International and European context in
relation to the fight against this hateful practice that, indeed, also poses a threat to
democracy itself; L’impatto dell’innovazione tecnologica sulla libertà di espressione – anche
in ragione della massiccia e rapida diffusione dei social media – induce a una
rinnovata riflessione sui possibili limiti e bilanciamenti con altri diritti cui questo
diritto può essere soggetto. In particolare, una deriva di tale libertà è oggi
rappresentata dal fenomeno dell’online sexist hate speech contro le giornaliste, che
ne lede in primis la dignità, oltre a provocare un preoccupante chilling effect sulla
loro libertà di espressione. Il presente lavoro, dunque, ricostruisce il contesto
internazionale ed europeo in relazione al contrasto a tale odiosa pratica che, invero,
si pone anche come minaccia alla stessa democrazia.
</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/6309</guid>
<dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>La normalizzazione della sorveglianza di massa nella prassi giurisprudenziale delle Corti di Strasburgo e Lussemburgo: verso il cambio di paradigma del rapporto privacy v. security</title>
<link>http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/6308</link>
<description>La normalizzazione della sorveglianza di massa nella prassi giurisprudenziale delle Corti di Strasburgo e Lussemburgo: verso il cambio di paradigma del rapporto privacy v. security
Nino, Michele
This essay deals with the analysis of the legality of the mass surveillance of personal data under international and European law in the light of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union. The contribution examines an important change of approach expressed over the years by these courts: on the one hand, in the first phase of their case law, the Courts had established the incompatibility of the indiscriminate and widespread collection of personal information with the European Convention on Human Rights and the relevant EU legislation on individual privacy; on the other hand, in the second phase the legality of said collection was affirmed. The article underlines that this new orientation, based on the paradigm shift between privacy and security and aimed at normalizing mass surveillance in the fight against terrorism and organized crime, raises several and complex issues with regard to the observance of human rights protected both by the Strasbourg system and by European Union law.
</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/6308</guid>
<dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
