| dc.contributor.author | Iermano, Anna | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-21T13:35:59Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-11-21T13:35:59Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Iermano, A. "Una "procedura di infrazione" anche nel sistema CEDU: similitudini e divergenze rispetto al "modello UE" ex artt. 258-260 TFUE." Freedom, Security & Justice: European Legal Studies 3 (2018): 26-43 | it_IT |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2532-2079 | it_IT |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10556/2973 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.26321/A.IERMANO.03.2018.03 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This article purports to analyse the “infringement proceedings” ex art. 46, paras. 4-5 ECHR in comparison to the “EU model” ex arts 258-260 TFEU, underlining similarities and divergences between them, in particular in the light of the case Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, that is the first case in which the Committee of Ministers decided to use this procedure against a State – Azerbaijan – that refuses to execute a judgment of the European Court of Human Rights. | it_IT |
| dc.format.extent | P. 26-43 | it_IT |
| dc.language.iso | it | it_IT |
| dc.source | UniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneo | it_IT |
| dc.subject | Infringement proceedings | it_IT |
| dc.subject | Arts. 258-260 TFEU | it_IT |
| dc.subject | Art. 25, paras. 4-5 ECHR | it_IT |
| dc.subject | Implementation judgments | it_IT |
| dc.subject | Mammadov case | it_IT |
| dc.title | Una "procedura di infrazione" anche nel sistema CEDU: similitudini e divergenze rispetto al "modello UE" ex artt. 258-260 TFUE | it_IT |
| dc.type | Journal Article | it_IT |
