dc.contributor.author | Cassetti, Luisa | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-08T07:33:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-08T07:33:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Cassetti, L. "Diritti, Carte e politiche pubbliche."Freedom, Security & Justice: European Legal Studies 1 (2020): 28-51 | it_IT |
dc.identifier.issn | 2532-2079 | it_IT |
dc.identifier.uri | http://elea.unisa.it:8080/xmlui/handle/10556/4307 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.fsjeurostudies.eu/files/3.FSJ.1.2020.Cassetti.pdf | |
dc.description.abstract | In the European multilevel protection of fundamental rights, which
involves the national judicial system, the supranational bodies and the international
protection of human rights, the relations between Constitutional Court and EU
Court of Justice are part of a legal system built on public policies, sources of law
and measures necessary for their implementation: in this perspective, the recent
claim of the «priority» of constitutional justice (when a constitutional guarantee
also reproduced in the European Charter of Fundamental Rights is at stake) poses
different interpretative problems compared to the current state of relations between
Constitutional Court and European Court of Human Rights. In the ECHR context,
the claim of the «highest level» of protection guaranteed by the constitutional system revolves exclusively around the definition of the individual fundamental
right and the interpretation of its limits. | it_IT |
dc.format.extent | P. 28-51 | it_IT |
dc.language.iso | it | it_IT |
dc.source | UniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneo | it_IT |
dc.subject | Multilevel protection of Fundamental Rights | it_IT |
dc.subject | Public policies | it_IT |
dc.subject | Constitutional justice | it_IT |
dc.subject | European Union | it_IT |
dc.subject | ECHR | it_IT |
dc.title | Diritti, Carte e politiche pubbliche | it_IT |
dc.type | Article | it_IT |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.26321/L.CASSETTI.01.2020.03 | |