Mostra i principali dati dell'item

dc.contributor.authorArnoux Bellavitis, Marguerite
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T12:08:25Z
dc.date.available2024-06-12T12:08:25Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationArnoux Bellavitis, M. "Policy-making as a crisis resolution tool: the normalization of exceptionality procedures at the expense of the rights of migrants". Freedom, Security & Justice: European Legal Studies 1 (2024): 173-195it_IT
dc.identifier.issn2532-2079it_IT
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.fsjeurostudies.eu/files/FSJ.1.2024.7.BELLAVITIS.pdfit_IT
dc.identifier.urihttp://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/7009
dc.description.abstractHis article aims to explore the impact that policy-making in times of crisis can have on the fundamental rights of migrants. In times of emergency and crisis situations, European institutions tend to bypass fundamental steps of the policy- making procedures, including the collection of evidence on which the legislative proposal will be developed. The permanent crisis situation in asylum and migration has led the EU institutions, particularly the European Commission to work in crisis mode since 2015. The Recast Return Directive Proposal was presented in 2018, and the Screening Regulation Proposal was presented in 2020 as part of the New Pact on Migration and Asylum. They were both presented during political crises and are currently under negotiation. Those texts did not go through evidence-based preparatory work within the Commission (such as impact assessments and stakeholders’ consultations), and their contents are emblematic of the securitised and restrictive approach at the EU level, thus making them very symbolic and political policy proposals. This restrictive trend goes against the existing fact-based need, acknowledged by the Commission, to attract migrants to address demographic challenges. This contribution seeks to analyse, through an interdisciplinary approach based on qualitative research methods, the impact that crises have on the EU decision- making, and their consequences for the human rights of migrants, based on two case studies of two legislative proposals currently under negotiation: the Recast Return Directive Proposal and the Screening Regulation Proposal.it_IT
dc.format.extentP. 173-195it_IT
dc.language.isoenit_IT
dc.rightsCC BY-SAit_IT
dc.sourceUniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneoit_IT
dc.subjectEU migrationit_IT
dc.subjectPolicyit_IT
dc.subjectCrisisit_IT
dc.subjectSecurityit_IT
dc.subjectReturnsit_IT
dc.subjectEvidence-based policyit_IT
dc.subjectEvidence-based policyit_IT
dc.subjectMakingit_IT
dc.titlePolicy-making as a crisis resolution tool: the normalization of exceptionality procedures at the expense of the rights of migrantsit_IT
dc.typeJournal Articleit_IT
dc.relation.ispartofjournalFreedom, Security & Justice: European Legal Studiesit_IT
dc.identifier.doi10.26321/M.ARNOUX.BELLAVITIS.01.2024.07it_IT
 Find Full text

Files in questo item

Thumbnail

Questo item appare nelle seguenti collezioni

Mostra i principali dati dell'item