Macroeconomic implications of fiscal policy
Abstract
This thesis investigates the macroeconomics e ects of scal policy from a theoretical and
empirical perspective.
The rst part of the thesis surveys recent theoretical and empirical studies in the
related literature. The analysis shows that while consensus has emerged on the positive
e ect that an expansionary scal policy has on output and hours worked, no
widespread consensus exists on the e ects that such a policy delivers to private consumption,
real wages and investment. While in standard RBC models the negative
wealth e ect on households' lifetime resource constraint prevails, in more or less articulated
new-Keynesian models a crowding-in e ect of consumption and an increase in
wages is made possible also under plausible calibrations. While early empirical contributions
gave credit to the standard neoclassical predictions, the most recent econometric
applications, generally making use of structural VARs, have supported and in many cases
have inspired the latest new-Keynesian claims.
Next, this work applies graphical modelling theory to identify scal policy shocks in
SVAR models of the US economy. Unlike other econometric approaches { which achieve
identi cation by relying on potentially contentious a priori assumptions { graphical modelling
is a data based tool. Our results are in line with Keynesian theoretical models,
being also quantitatively similar to those obtained in the recent SVAR literature a la
Blanchard and Perotti (2002), and contrast with neoclassical real business cycle predictions.
Stability checks con rm that our ndings are not driven by sample selection.
In its nal part, the thesis empirically explores the information content of a large set
of scal indicators for US real output growth and in
ation. We provide evidence that
uctuations in certain scal variables contain valuable information to predict
uctuations
in output and prices. The distinction between federal and state-local scal indicators
yields useful insights and helps de ne a new set of stylized facts for US macroeconomic
conditions. First, we nd that variations in state-local indirect taxes as well as state
government surplus or de cit help predict output growth. Next, the federal counterparts
of these indicators contain valuable information for in
ation. Finally, state-local expenditures
help predict US in
ation. A set of formal and informal stability tests con rm
that these relationships are stable. The scal indicators in questions are also among theones that yield the best in-sample and out-of-sample performances.