Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTrifone, Gian Paolo
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-17T09:20:14Z
dc.date.available2019-07-17T09:20:14Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationTrifone, G. P. "Un confronto sulla proporzionale: Francesco Ruffini e Gaspare Ambrosini." Iura and Legal Systems 2014, B(7): 94-108.it_IT
dc.identifier.issn2385-2445it_IT
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.rivistagiuridica.unisa.it/indexit_IT
dc.identifier.urihttp://elea.unisa.it:8080/xmlui/handle/10556/3542
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.14273/unisa-1773
dc.description.abstractThe essay provides an overview on the comparison between Francesco Ruffini and Gaspare Ambrosini. The jourists vaunt different opinions on the problem of proportional representation, with particolar reference to the parliamentary committees’ composition. Ruffini is concerned about social interests and deems that they should be represented in the High Chamber of Parliament. But, sticking to the jusformalistic theory, he still distinguishes representative and deliberative decision. Ambrosini is critical about Ruffini's separation between society and institutions. In his analysis, after the introduction of the electoral proportional system, social interests are channeled in Parliament through political parties, who become the new subjects in policy.it_IT
dc.format.extentP. 94-108it_IT
dc.language.isoitit_IT
dc.sourceUniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneoit_IT
dc.titleUn confronto sulla proporzionale: Francesco Ruffini e Gaspare Ambrosiniit_IT
dc.typeJournal Articleit_IT
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record