Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYeats, Christine
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-20T08:13:33Z
dc.date.available2024-09-20T08:13:33Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationChristine Yeats, Should They Stay or Should They Go?: Contested Statues, «Public History Review», 28 (2021), pp. 1–3it_IT
dc.identifier.issn1833-4989it_IT
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5130/phrj.v28i0.7512it_IT
dc.identifier.urihttp://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/7363
dc.description.abstractThis contribution considers the current debates about the place of monuments, such as the statue of Captain Cook in Hyde Park, which reached a recent high point during the Black Lives Matter protests across Australia in mid 2020. While removing contentious statues from public view may address concerns about their unwanted presence, we must ensure that the contested history they embody is not also erased from society’s memory. We need to develop an acceptable framework for dealing with such monuments within their historical context. Ultimately, there is no single answer to the question: should the vestiges of flawed historical narratives stay or go? It depends on the circumstances of each case. But some things are clear. There is a need for Australia to redress historical and current wrongs against First Nations people.it_IT
dc.language.isoenit_IT
dc.publisherC. Yeats, Should They Stay or Should They Go?: Contested Statues, «Public History Review», 28 (2021), pp. 1–3it_IT
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0it_IT
dc.sourceUniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneoit_IT
dc.subjectBlack Lives Matterit_IT
dc.subjectContestedit_IT
dc.subjectContextit_IT
dc.subjectFirst Nationsit_IT
dc.subjectMemoryit_IT
dc.titleShould They Stay or Should They Go? Contested Statuesit_IT
dc.typeJournal Articleit_IT
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPublic History Reviewit_IT
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5130/phrj.v28i0.7512it_IT
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record