dc.contributor.author | Hughes, Heather <Lincoln University> | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-30T10:43:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-30T10:43:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Heather Hughes, Public Histories in South Africa: Between Contest and Reconciliation, Public History Review, 30 (2023), pp. 31–42 | it_IT |
dc.identifier.issn | 1833-4989 | it_IT |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.5130/phrj.v30i0.8374 | it_IT |
dc.identifier.uri | http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/7407 | |
dc.description.abstract | Public history has long been practiced in South Africa, yet its content and purpose have always been deeply contested. In a deliberate, state-driven process, it has undergone extensive change since 1994, helping to redefine the nation in the post-apartheid era. There have been two principal means of achieving this goal: the first has been to commission a large number of new memory sites and the second has been to insist on a renovation of older sites, whose previous incarnation served the narrow interests of a small white minority. While clear new narratives have emerged, the process has witnessed continuing contests over representation and competing claims to the heritage estate. | it_IT |
dc.language.iso | en | it_IT |
dc.publisher | H. Hughes, Public Histories in South Africa: Between Contest and Reconciliation, Public History Review, 30 (2023), pp. 31–42 | it_IT |
dc.rights | CC BY 4.0 | it_IT |
dc.source | UniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneo | it_IT |
dc.subject | Legacy project | it_IT |
dc.subject | Post-apartheid memorial complex | it_IT |
dc.subject | Struggle narrative | it_IT |
dc.subject | Rehumanising heritage | it_IT |
dc.title | Public Histories in South Africa: Between Contest and Reconciliation | it_IT |
dc.type | Journal Article | it_IT |
dc.relation.ispartofjournal | Public History Review | it_IT |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.5130/phrj.v30i0.8374 | it_IT |