Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/2548
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPerrini, Francesca-
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-28T10:06:12Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-28T10:06:12Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationPerrini, F. "Dalla direttiva 2011/95/UE alla proposta di Regolamento qualifiche: quale futuro per la protezione internazionale nell’ordinamento UE?" Freedom, Security & Justice: European Legal Studies 3 (2017): 56-70it_IT
dc.identifier.issn2532-2079it_IT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10556/2548-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.26321/F.PERRINI.03.2017.04-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.fsjeurostudies.eu/files/FSJ.2017.III.Perrini_4DEF.pdfit_IT
dc.description.abstractThe European Institutions are currently examining a new reform of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS). The reform at stake casts many doubts both with reference to the effectiveness of the measures provided in response to the migration phenomenon, and to the guarantees and the protection of the rights of vulnerable categories of migrants involved. In particular, the article makes a comparison between Directive 2011/95 currently in force and the proposal for a Regulation COM (2016) 466. This comparison shows that if the proposal for a regulation were accepted without amendments, there would be a sensible lowering of the level of guarantees and rights for the beneficiaries of International protection.it_IT
dc.format.extentP. 56-70it_IT
dc.language.isoitit_IT
dc.sourceUniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneoit_IT
dc.subjectInternational protectionit_IT
dc.subjectDirective 2011/95it_IT
dc.subjectCommon European Asylum System (CEAS)it_IT
dc.subjectProposal for Regulation on Qualificationsit_IT
dc.subjectSubsidiary protectionit_IT
dc.titleDalla direttiva 2011/95/UE alla proposta di Regolamento qualifiche: quale futuro per la protezione internazionale nell’ordinamento UE?it_IT
dc.typeJournal Articleit_IT
Appears in Collections:Freedom, Security & Justice: European Legal Studies (2017), n.3

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FSJ.2017.III.Perrini_4DEF.pdfFSJ.2017.III.Perrini_41,11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.