Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/3573
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-18T14:10:05Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-18T14:10:05Z-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this paper is to verify whether and to which extent a person is protected from the risk of trial and sentence duplication within the European judicial compass. To that end, we have analyzed the progressive development of the ne bis in idem principle in light of the different sources of national law and international treaty law in which it is included, and the newly emerging issues related to identifying the principle’s operative boundaries in the recent jurisprudential drafting.it_IT
dc.language.isoitit_IT
dc.identifier.citationNormando, R. "C. EDU, 4 marzo 2014, ricorsi nn. 18640/10, 18647/10, 18663/10, 10668/10 e 18698/10, Franzo Grande Stevens e altri c. Italia, in www.duitbase.it" Iura & Legal Systems 2015, E(2): 18-27.it_IT
dc.titleC. EDU, 4 marzo 2014, ricorsi nn. 18640/10, 18647/10, 18663/10, 10668/10 e 18698/10, Franzo Grande Stevens e altri c. Italia, in www.duitbase.itit_IT
dc.sourceUniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneoit_IT
dc.contributor.authorNormando, Rosalba-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.urihttp://elea.unisa.it:8080/xmlui/handle/10556/3573-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.14273/unisa-1803-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.rivistagiuridica.unisa.it/indexit_IT
dc.typeJournal Articleit_IT
dc.format.extentP. 18-27it_IT
dc.identifier.issn2385-2445it_IT
Appears in Collections:Iura & Legal Systems. Volume 2 (Gennaio - Dicembre 2015)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Iura and Legal Systems 2015, E(2), 18-27.pdfIura and Legal Systems 2015, E(2), 18-27469.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.