1. Elea
  2. Dipartimenti e Centri di ricerca UniSA. Pubblicazioni scientifiche
  3. Translational Medicine @ UniSa
  4. Translational Medicine @ UniSa. Volume 21 (jan.-apr. 2020)
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/4613
Record completo di tutti i metadati
Campo DCValoreLingua
dcterms.contributor.authorMaisto, Maria-
dcterms.contributor.authorFerrante, Liborio-
dcterms.contributor.authorGiribono, Anna Maria-
dcterms.contributor.authorSodo, Maurizio-
dcterms.contributor.authorPanagrosso, Marco-
dcterms.contributor.authorPeluso, Andrea-
dcterms.contributor.authorDel Guercio, Luca-
dcterms.contributor.authorBracale, Umberto Marcello-
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-01T09:34:16Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-01T09:34:16Z-
dcterms.date.issued2020-
dcterms.identifier.citationMaisto M, Ferrante L, Giribono AM, Sodo M, Panagrosso M, Peluso A, del Guercio L, Bracale UM. Harmonic focus versus conventional electrocautery for femoral artery exposure: a "direct" comparison on the same patients. Translational Medicine @ UniSa 2020, 21(8): 27-30.it_IT
dcterms.identifier.issn2239-9747it_IT
dcterms.identifier.urihttp://www.translationalmedicine.unisa.it/indexit_IT
dcterms.identifier.urihttp://elea.unisa.it:8080/xmlui/handle/10556/4613-
dcterms.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.14273/unisa-2805-
dc.description.abstractSurgical access complications during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are reported relatively frequent. HARMONIC FOCUS® (HF; Ethicon EndoSurgery Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio, USA) is a device developed to improve bleeding control and reduce heat-related damage stemming from surgical preparation. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes and safety of HF versus conventional haemostasis with electrocautery, both techniques used in the same patient. Five patients developed bilateral wound’s thickening (13.9%) demonstrated at the CT scan, two of whom had no clinical manifestation while in three cases the thickening was associated with lymphocele (4.54%), 2 of which were in the side where the EC was used (5.5%), and 1 case (2.7%), in the HF applied side. One isolated lymphocele occurred at the left groin (2.7%) (tables n.2-3). A Fisher’s exact test was conducted between EC and HF on the occurrence of wound healing complications (3/36 for EC and 1/36 for HF) that resulted statistically significant at p<0.05. Focus Harmonic Scalpel has certain advantages than conventional haemostasis in avoiding surgical access complications.it_IT
dcterms.format.extentP. 27-30it_IT
dc.language.isoenit_IT
dcterms.sourceUniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneoit_IT
dcterms.subjectFocus Harmonic Scalpelit_IT
dcterms.subjectFemoral arteryit_IT
dcterms.subjectComplicationsit_IT
dcterms.subjectAbdominal aneurysmit_IT
dcterms.subjectEndovascular repairit_IT
dcterms.titleHarmonic focus versus conventional electrocautery for femoral artery exposure: a "direct" comparison on the same patientsit_IT
dcterms.typeArticleit_IT
È visualizzato nelle collezioni:Translational Medicine @ UniSa. Volume 21 (jan.-apr. 2020)

File in questo documento:
Non ci sono file allegati a questo documento
Visualizza la scheda semplice del documento SFX Query


Tutti i documenti archiviati in DSpace sono protetti da copyright. Tutti i diritti riservati.