Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/5502
Abstract: | This essay starts from the analysis of the Court of Strasbourg judgment of 1 September 2015 in “Lampedusa case” (judgment Khlaifia), pending before the Grand Chamber. It focuses on the compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights – specially article 5 ECHR containing the right to personal freedom – of activities of first assistance and identification of migrants, often associated to forms of “detention” not fully complying with the conventional parameter. Therefore, similar reflections concern present “hotspot” system, wanted by the European Union through the adoption, in 2015, of the European Agenda on Migration. |
Appears in Collections: | Iura & Legal Systems. Volume 3 (Gennaio - Dicembre 2016) |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.