Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/6059
Title: Practice vs. Theory and Rüsen’s New Historik
Authors: Demantowsky, Marko
Issue Date: 2013
Citation: Marko Demantowsky, Practice vs. Theory and Rüsen’s New Historik, «Public history weekly», 1, 2013, n. 14, [Consultabile solo online], dx.doi.org/10.1515/phw-2013-889
Abstract: The article takes Jörn Rüsen’s new book on the theory of history as an opportunity to think more closely about the relationship between theory and practice, especially when it comes to teaching in the field of public history. The argumentation is based on recent research in the psychology of learning.
Die Praxis als Fetisch? “Theorie” ist ein geschichtsdidaktisches Zauberwort zur Professionalisierungsprovokation. Die meisten Studierenden wollen sie nicht und ertragen sie nur widerwillig. Vielen praktizierenden LehrerInnen aller Berufsphasen geht es ebenso, wenn sie ihnen in den seltenen Fortbildungen oder in den (nicht oft gelesenen) geschichtsdidaktischen Texten begegnet.
URI: http://elea.unisa.it:8080/xmlui/handle/10556/6059
http://dx.doi.org/10.14273/unisa-4151
https://public-history-weekly.degruyter.com/1-2013-14/praxis-vs-theorie-und-ruesens-neue-historik/
ISSN: 2197-6376
Appears in Collections:Contributi in rivista / Contributions in journals and magazines

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
pdf non disponibile. Consultabile solo online all'URI indicata.jpgpdf non disponibile. Consultabile solo online all'URI indicata17,55 kBJPEGView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.