<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Translational Medicine @ UniSa. Volume 16 (jan.-jun. 2017)</title>
<link href="http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/4465" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/4465</id>
<updated>2026-04-14T12:43:22Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-14T12:43:22Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Dexmedetomidine: current role in burn ICU</title>
<link href="http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/4490" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Scibelli, Gennaro</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Maio, Lucia</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Sasso, Maiara</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Lanza, Alessandro</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Savoia, Giorgio</name>
</author>
<id>http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/4490</id>
<updated>2025-04-30T15:28:18Z</updated>
<published>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Dexmedetomidine: current role in burn ICU
Scibelli, Gennaro; Maio, Lucia; Sasso, Maiara; Lanza, Alessandro; Savoia, Giorgio
Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a relatively recent a2-adrenergic agonist which provides sedation,
anxiolysis and analgesia with much less respiratory depression than other sedatives. These characteristics have
implemented the use of the drug in the ICUs in order to achieve the target of a “arousable sedation”, thanks to
its significant manageability. Its sedative-analgesic properties are also particularly suitable for use in burn
ICUs, both adult and pediatric, which is why the current Guidelines have recognized a central role in the
management of these categories of patients. Finally, DEX has showed significant anti-inflammatory effect
both in animal models and in preliminary clinical trials, reducing vasopressor requirements and main
mediators levels of the systemic inflammatory response involved in sepsis and similar processes, suggestingits use for improved outcome in ICU septic patients.
</summary>
<dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Obesity and obesity related diseases, sugar consumption and bad oral health: a fatal epidemic mixture. The pediatric and odontologist point of view</title>
<link href="http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/4489" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Delli Bovi, Anna Pia</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Di Michele, Laura</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Laino, Giuliana</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Vajro, Pietro</name>
</author>
<id>http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/4489</id>
<updated>2025-04-30T15:28:35Z</updated>
<published>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Obesity and obesity related diseases, sugar consumption and bad oral health: a fatal epidemic mixture. The pediatric and odontologist point of view
Delli Bovi, Anna Pia; Di Michele, Laura; Laino, Giuliana; Vajro, Pietro
Obesity and dental caries are increasingly widespread
pathologies. The former is growing so rapidly that the
WHO classified its trend as an “epidemic”. Both are
triggered by a number of well known common etiologic
factors sharing also the high added sugar amount since
childhood. Because of its fermentation and pH lowering,
dietary sugar allows the cariogenic bacteria to damage the
tooth enamel provoking the carious lesions.
WHO guidelines recommend reducing sugar intake to
10% of the total daily energy need, and highlight that
there is evidence which suggests cuttingthis value down to
5% at least. The American guidelines addressing
paediatric age put the limit to 25gr a day with a total ban
on sugar in those aged 2 or less.
</summary>
<dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Larger blood pressure reduction by fixed-dose compared to free dose combination therapy of ace inhibitor and calcium antagonist in hypertensive patients</title>
<link href="http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/4488" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Visco, Valeria</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Finelli, Rosa</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Pascale, Antonietta Valeria</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Giannotti, Rocco</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Fabbricatore, Davide</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Ragosa, Nicola</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Ciccarelli, Michele</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Iaccarino, Guido</name>
</author>
<id>http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/4488</id>
<updated>2025-04-30T15:28:16Z</updated>
<published>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Larger blood pressure reduction by fixed-dose compared to free dose combination therapy of ace inhibitor and calcium antagonist in hypertensive patients
Visco, Valeria; Finelli, Rosa; Pascale, Antonietta Valeria; Giannotti, Rocco; Fabbricatore, Davide; Ragosa, Nicola; Ciccarelli, Michele; Iaccarino, Guido
The introduction of fixed combination of
ACEi+CCB (Fixed) has significantly increased patients
compliance and adherence to therapy. At the moment,
however, there are no data suggesting the better control of
once-daily fixed (Fixed) over free doses in separate
administrations combination therapy in hypertensives.
In a population of 39 consecutive outpatient patients
referred to the departmental Hypertension clinic of the
University Hospital of Salerno Medical School with the
first diagnosis of arterial hypertension, we tested the
hypothesis that the Fixed achieve a better control of blood
pressure than the Free combination. Patients were
randomized to either strategy and after 3 months patients
underwent a clinical assessment to evaluate the
antihypertensive effect. The two groups, matched for
anthropometric and clinical parameters, received
Amlodipine (5-10 mg/daily) and Perindopril (5-10
mg/daily). Perindopril and Amlodipine doses did not
significantly differ between the two groups. After 3
months BP control was improved in both groups and BP
targets were similarly reached in both groups (SBP; Fixed:
61.54%; Free 69.23%; n.s. DPB; Fixed: 80.77%; Free
84.62%; n.s.). The reduction in systolic blood pressure
was similar in both groups (Fixed:7.64±2.49%; Free:
7.81±4.00%, n.s.), while the reduction of diastolic blood
pressure was greater in the Fixed group (Fixed:
14.22±2.03%; Free: 4.92±5.00%, p&lt;0.05).
Although both strategies are effective in reducing BP, the
use of Fixed dose has an advantage in the reduction of BP.
The present study does not allow to identify the
mechanisms of this difference, which can be assumed to
be due to the pharmacokinetics of the drugs administered
in once-daily fixed combination.
</summary>
<dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Implementing an ict-based polypharmacy management program in Italy</title>
<link href="http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/4487" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Arcopinto, Michele</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Cataldi, Mauro</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>De Luca, Vincenzo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Orlando, Valentina</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Simeone, Giuseppe</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>D’Assante, Roberta</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Postiglione, Alfredo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Guida, Antonella</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Trama, Ugo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Illario, Maddalena</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Coscioni, Enrico</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Iaccarino, Guido</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Cuccaro, Paula</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>D’Onofrio, Gaetano</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Vigorito, Carlo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Cittadini, Antonio</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Ferrara, Nicola</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Menditto, Enrico</name>
</author>
<id>http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/4487</id>
<updated>2025-04-30T15:28:14Z</updated>
<published>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Implementing an ict-based polypharmacy management program in Italy
Arcopinto, Michele; Cataldi, Mauro; De Luca, Vincenzo; Orlando, Valentina; Simeone, Giuseppe; D’Assante, Roberta; Postiglione, Alfredo; Guida, Antonella; Trama, Ugo; Illario, Maddalena; Coscioni, Enrico; Iaccarino, Guido; Cuccaro, Paula; D’Onofrio, Gaetano; Vigorito, Carlo; Cittadini, Antonio; Ferrara, Nicola; Menditto, Enrico
Although there is evidence of a growing
awareness of the problem, no official policy statements or
regulatory guidelines on polypharmacy have been released
up to date by Italian Health Authorities. Medication
review, application of appropriateness criteria and
computerized prescription support systems are all possible
approaches in order to improve the quality of prescribing
in older persons. More focused training courses on
multimorbidity and polytherapy management are
encouraged. Furthermore a multidisciplinary approach
integrating different health care professionals (physicians,
pharmacists, and nurses) may positively impact on
reducing the sense of fear related to discontinue or
substitute drugs prescribed by others; the fragmentation of
therapy among different specialists; reducing costs; and
improving adverse drug reaction detection and reporting.
Aiming at achieving the individualized pharmacotherapy,
a multidisciplinary approach starting with identification of
patients and risk for drug-related problems, followed by
medication review overtime and use of inappropriateness
criteria, supported by computerized systems has been
proposed.
</summary>
<dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
