<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Culture e Studi del Sociale. Vol. 5, n. 1 (2020)</title>
<link href="http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/4741" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle>Cultura, mutamento, sviluppo / Culture, Change, Development</subtitle>
<id>http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/4741</id>
<updated>2026-04-22T12:19:59Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-22T12:19:59Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Multilevel Citizenship: The Future of Social Inclusion</title>
<link href="http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/4766" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Cagiano De Azevedo, Raimondo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Paparusso, Angela</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Vaccaro, Mauro</name>
</author>
<id>http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/4766</id>
<updated>2025-08-01T06:54:11Z</updated>
<published>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Multilevel Citizenship: The Future of Social Inclusion
Cagiano De Azevedo, Raimondo; Paparusso, Angela; Vaccaro, Mauro
The principle of subsidiarity was formally introduced in the European Union’s legislation framework in 1992 with the Treaty of Maastricht; although already in 1986, the European Single Act authorized Community action only if a specific objective could be better attained at the Community level. However, the subsidiarity principle inspiring the functionalist approach – according to which the best solution is always the most effective – can be found already in the Vedel Report (25 March 1972), aimed at examining the problem of the extension of the powers of the European Parliament. The principle of subsidiary is the reorganization of authority in the European Union (EU), an important policy-creating process in which authority and policy-making influences are shared across multiple levels of government.
</summary>
<dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Cultura, Mutamento e Sviluppo nell’Agenda ONU 2030 per lo sviluppo sostenibile</title>
<link href="http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/4765" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Memoli, Rosanna</name>
</author>
<id>http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/4765</id>
<updated>2025-08-01T06:55:00Z</updated>
<published>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Cultura, Mutamento e Sviluppo nell’Agenda ONU 2030 per lo sviluppo sostenibile
Memoli, Rosanna
A glance at the past has revealed that in the years of reconstruction after the Second World
War a different distribution of resources, technological know-how caused a gap between
developed and underdeveloped countries, generating rebellions and conflicts. Forecast
studies, (Future Studies) and Global Planning showed that the risks of a progressive
slowdown in development were largely due to the ecological limits imposed by the world’s
finite resources and the inability of the biosphere to absorb the waste produced by men
activity. Nowadays, the socio-economic and environmental context appears to be
characterized by a “cultural emergency”; by a process of change that lasts over the long
term and is distinct from “complexity”; from “globalization”; by the barriers that block the
“Development”, hindered by a strong imbalance between men and nature and the
inequalities. In this issue, the excursus within today’s instances that characterize the
concepts of Culture, Change and Development is the background to the Essays,
Experiences, Notes and Comparisons that intersect each other in an operational way,
entering into the merits of the individual objectives of the UNO agenda within an
epistemological, methodological and technical framework capable of suggesting ideas in
the field of public policy design.
</summary>
<dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Epistemologie della sostenibilità:  ragionamenti e politiche non standard</title>
<link href="http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/4764" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Gagliasso, Elena</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Campanella, Sara</name>
</author>
<id>http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/4764</id>
<updated>2025-08-01T06:55:32Z</updated>
<published>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Epistemologie della sostenibilità:  ragionamenti e politiche non standard
Gagliasso, Elena; Campanella, Sara
Sustainability  perspectives  require non-standard scientific  and  political  reasoning,  now  more than ever. The lexicons of ecology and political economy articulate epistemic catego-ries and imaginaries in which humans and environments are in mutual relationship avoiding an exploitation logic of the former. We support these scenarios allow to grasp the disconti-nuities  between  the  past  and  the  present  of  the  environmental  movements,  between  the  scientific  ideals  of  modernity and the contemporary ones. The need to connect two oppos-ing  styles  of  reasoning  is  progressing:  the  theme  of  the  non-neutrality  of  science  and  the  need  for  science  based  political  judgments.  In  this  previously  unknown  combination  of  science and society, the current democratic practices of "multilevel co-production" between researchers  and  active  citizenship  (citizen-science)  mark  realistic  governance  pathways  of  the planetary ecological crisis to which governments seem to have to face, sooner as possible.
</summary>
<dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Scarsità e sovranità. Riflessioni sulla sostenibilità alla luce delle idee di Dumouchel e Bataille</title>
<link href="http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/4763" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Conti, Uliano</name>
</author>
<id>http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/4763</id>
<updated>2025-08-01T06:55:57Z</updated>
<published>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Scarsità e sovranità. Riflessioni sulla sostenibilità alla luce delle idee di Dumouchel e Bataille
Conti, Uliano
The article proposes a reflection on two concepts, related to the theme of sustainability. The first is scarcity, the latter is sovereignty. The article considers the institution of the scarcity on a social level. In this perspective, scarcity is a set of goods and resources insufficient to satisfy the needs of all people. The paper emphasizes not only a natural dimension linked to human needs, but also a social dimension:  the  conditions  for  the  institution  of  scarcity  are  not  only  economic,  but  related  to  power  and  interest  to  manage  a  resource.  In  this  sense,  scarcity is not just a natural fact. The idea of scarcity is socially established and the social institution  of  scarcity  is  a  means  of  controlling  the  conflict.  Secondly,  the  paper  proposes  the Bataillean concept of dépense, which includes not only the excessive consumption, but also the dimensions of luxury, of play, of art, of the sacred. In such dimensions, time and resources are not destined to a profit, but are an end in themselves, in a non-utilitarian way. The dépense  implies sovereign attitudes and behaviours of people over things, thanks to a way of consuming goods according to a non-servile logic.
</summary>
<dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
