Una "procedura di infrazione" anche nel sistema CEDU: similitudini e divergenze rispetto al   "modello UE" ex artt. 258-260 TFUE

dc.contributor.author	Iermano, Anna
dc.date.accessioned	2018-11-21T13:35:59Z
dc.date.available	2018-11-21T13:35:59Z
dc.date.issued	2018
dc.identifier.citation	Iermano, A. "Una "procedura di infrazione" anche nel sistema CEDU: similitudini e divergenze rispetto al "modello UE" ex artt. 258-260 TFUE." Freedom, Security & Justice: European Legal Studies 3 (2018): 26-43	it_IT
dc.identifier.issn	2532-2079	it_IT
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10556/2973
dc.identifier.uri	http://dx.doi.org/10.26321/A.IERMANO.03.2018.03
dc.description.abstract	This article purports to analyse the “infringement proceedings” ex art. 46, paras. 4-5 ECHR in comparison to the “EU model” ex arts 258-260 TFEU, underlining similarities and divergences between them, in particular in the light of the case Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, that is the first case in which the Committee of Ministers decided to use this procedure against a State – Azerbaijan – that refuses to execute a judgment of the European Court of Human Rights.	it_IT
dc.format.extent	P. 26-43	it_IT
dc.language.iso	it	it_IT
dc.source	UniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneo	it_IT
dc.subject	Infringement proceedings	it_IT
dc.subject	Arts. 258-260 TFEU	it_IT
dc.subject	Art. 25, paras. 4-5 ECHR	it_IT
dc.subject	Implementation judgments	it_IT
dc.subject	Mammadov case	it_IT
dc.title	Una "procedura di infrazione" anche nel sistema CEDU: similitudini e divergenze rispetto al "modello UE" ex artt. 258-260 TFUE	it_IT
dc.type	Journal Article	it_IT

Find Full text