dc.contributor.author | Carli, Eugenio | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-11T08:42:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-04-11T08:42:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Carli, E. "EU Readmission Agreements as Tools for Fighting Irregular Migration: An Appraisal Twenty Years on from the Tampere European Council." Freedom, Security & Justice: European Legal Studies 1 (2019): 11-29 | it_IT |
dc.identifier.issn | 2532-2079 | it_IT |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10556/3226 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/v | |
dc.description.abstract | The EU has concluded so far seventeen readmission agreements with
third countries with the aim of combating irregular immigration into its territories, as
part of the strategic guidelines of the EU Area of Freedom, Security and Justice.
Since the first EURA concluded with Hong Kong, some developments in the drafting
of these agreements have occurred, and in particular a greater attention for respect of
readmitted persons’ rights can be identified. These agreements seem to be working
quite well and their objective to regulate irregular immigration, according to
statistics, is being met. However, the most relevant third States in terms of origin of
immigrants are still not bound by any EURA and human rights issues – notably
related to the respect of the principle of non-refoulement – are likely to arise. | it_IT |
dc.format.extent | P. 11-29 | it_IT |
dc.language.iso | en | it_IT |
dc.source | UniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneo | it_IT |
dc.subject | EU readmission agreements | it_IT |
dc.subject | Irregular immigration | it_IT |
dc.subject | Human rights protection | it_IT |
dc.subject | Non-affection clause | it_IT |
dc.subject | Principle of non-refoulement | it_IT |
dc.title | EU Readmission Agreements as Tools for Fighting Irregular Migration: An Appraisal Twenty Years on from the Tampere European Council | it_IT |
dc.type | Journal Article | it_IT |