Mostra i principali dati dell'item

dc.contributor.authorNormando, Rosalba
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-18T14:10:05Z
dc.date.available2019-07-18T14:10:05Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationNormando, R. "C. EDU, 4 marzo 2014, ricorsi nn. 18640/10, 18647/10, 18663/10, 10668/10 e 18698/10, Franzo Grande Stevens e altri c. Italia, in www.duitbase.it" Iura & Legal Systems 2015, E(2): 18-27.it_IT
dc.identifier.issn2385-2445it_IT
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.rivistagiuridica.unisa.it/indexit_IT
dc.identifier.urihttp://elea.unisa.it:8080/xmlui/handle/10556/3573
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.14273/unisa-1803
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this paper is to verify whether and to which extent a person is protected from the risk of trial and sentence duplication within the European judicial compass. To that end, we have analyzed the progressive development of the ne bis in idem principle in light of the different sources of national law and international treaty law in which it is included, and the newly emerging issues related to identifying the principle’s operative boundaries in the recent jurisprudential drafting.it_IT
dc.format.extentP. 18-27it_IT
dc.language.isoitit_IT
dc.sourceUniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneoit_IT
dc.titleC. EDU, 4 marzo 2014, ricorsi nn. 18640/10, 18647/10, 18663/10, 10668/10 e 18698/10, Franzo Grande Stevens e altri c. Italia, in www.duitbase.itit_IT
dc.typeJournal Articleit_IT
 Find Full text

Files in questo item

Thumbnail

Questo item appare nelle seguenti collezioni

Mostra i principali dati dell'item