Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOriolo, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-01T10:58:49Z
dc.date.available2021-06-01T10:58:49Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationOriolo, A. “Right to the truth and International Jurisprudence as the "Conscience" Of Humanity. Comparative insights from the European and Inter-American Courts Of Human Rights.” Iura and Legal Systems 2016, C(8): 66-95.it_IT
dc.identifier.issn2385-2445it_IT
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.rivistagiuridica.unisa.it/indexit_IT
dc.identifier.urihttp://elea.unisa.it:8080/xmlui/handle/10556/5483
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.14273/unisa-3600
dc.description.abstractIn recent decades, the right to the truth has increasingly come to the attention of international scholars and jurisprudence. Moving from the recognition of truth as a right in the international arena and exploring the reconstruction and evolution of the right to the truth in the international human rights courts’ case-law, the following analysis focuses on the ECtHR and IACtHR insights in a comparative perspective to conclude on the emerging trends of the Strasbourg Court and the Court of San José in interpreting and applying the right to the truth, thereby acting as the “conscience” of the whole of humanity.it_IT
dc.format.extentP. 66-95it_IT
dc.language.isoenit_IT
dc.sourceUniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneoit_IT
dc.titleRight to the truth and International Jurisprudence as the "Conscience" Of Humanity. Comparative insights from the European and Inter-American Courts Of Human Rightsit_IT
dc.typeJournal Articleit_IT
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record