Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPalladino, Rossana
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-07T09:49:08Z
dc.date.available2021-06-07T09:49:08Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationPalladino, R. “Dal caso Khalaifia agli hotspot: alcune riflessioni sulla compatibilita' della detenzione dei migranti rispetto alla Cedu.” Iura and Legal Systems 2016, A (2): 28-38.it_IT
dc.identifier.issn2385-2445it_IT
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.rivistagiuridica.unisa.it/indexit_IT
dc.identifier.urihttp://elea.unisa.it:8080/xmlui/handle/10556/5502
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.14273/unisa-3618
dc.description.abstractThis essay starts from the analysis of the Court of Strasbourg judgment of 1 September 2015 in “Lampedusa case” (judgment Khlaifia), pending before the Grand Chamber. It focuses on the compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights – specially article 5 ECHR containing the right to personal freedom – of activities of first assistance and identification of migrants, often associated to forms of “detention” not fully complying with the conventional parameter. Therefore, similar reflections concern present “hotspot” system, wanted by the European Union through the adoption, in 2015, of the European Agenda on Migration.it_IT
dc.format.extentP. 28-38it_IT
dc.language.isoitit_IT
dc.sourceUniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneoit_IT
dc.titleDal caso Khalaifia agli hotspot: alcune riflessioni sulla compatibilita' della detenzione dei migranti rispetto alla Ceduit_IT
dc.typeJournal Articleit_IT
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record