Public history and contested heritage: memories of the bombing of Italy in the International Bomber Command Centre Digital Archive
Date
2020Author
Fedele, Greta <Lapsus Laboratorio di analisi storica del mondo contemporaneo (Lapsus), Milan>
Gaiaschi, Zeno <Lapsus Laboratorio di analisi storica del mondo contemporaneo (Lapsus), Milan>
Hughes, Heather <IBCC Digital Archive, University of Lincoln>
Pesaro, Alessandro <IBCC Digital Archive, University of Lincoln>
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
In recent years public historians have made concerted attempts to internationalise their
practice.1
The editors of a recent collection note that public history remains rooted
in ‘the local’, although it may acquire regional or national significance.2
The goal of
internationalisation is therefore ‘about applying universal methods locally’,3
even though
applications have developed differently in different national settings. Digital public history has
assisted the process of internationalisation.4
The greater the spatial spread, however, the more
likely it becomes that public historians must confront contested understandings of the past. In
few localities, whether in actual or virtual environments, is there a single, accepted version of
events and meanings.5
Little attention has as yet been paid to public history projects that function at the national
level. This article addresses an example: the International Bomber Command Centre (IBCC)
Digital Archive. It operates across national boundaries – in this case Italy and Britain – and
attempts to embrace vastly different meanings associated with the bombing war in Europe,
1939-1945. It begins with an account of the development of public history in these two
countries and of the ways in which the bombing war has been remembered. It then sets
out the authors’ understanding of the cultural and political sensitivities that have had to be
considered, and the efforts of participants to develop and practice an inclusive approach to
digital public history. Finally, it reflects on the limitations and achievements of the chosen
approach.