Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDurante, Milena
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-20T14:06:26Z
dc.date.available2023-03-20T14:06:26Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-06
dc.identifier.urihttp://elea.unisa.it:8080/xmlui/handle/10556/6492
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.14273/unisa-4564
dc.description2019 - 2020it_IT
dc.description.abstractSince the fall of the Berlin Wall, the religious question has taken on a “new central role” in the current geopolitical and multicultural scenario. This religious protagonism is also reflected in the jurisprudential dynamics and, in particular, in those of the European Court of Human Rights, the organ responsible for the protection of the rights consecrated in the European Convention on Human Rights signed in 1950. Europe, in fact, both at the legislative and jurisprudential level, on religious freedom, has taken a constant oscillatory movement between the need to establish an incremental protection of the fundamental rights of individuals and the need to respect the different constitutional traditions of individual States, which has also been reflected on majority judgements of the Strasbourg Court. With this essay, a reversal of perspective will be made: instead of analyzing the jurisprudential orientations arising from the majority judgments of the Court, an attempt will be made to identify a parallel jurisprudential trend, taking into consideration only the dissenting opinions expressed in the judgments relating to Article 9 ECHR, through which the positions of those judges who, in the context of a judicial body, wish to express their dissent to the majority position. The hope is that the instrument of dissent may penetrate the “wall” of the discretionary power of individual States, so that national law can adapt and spontaneously accept the principles that resulting from it, while maintaining, each one, its own peculiarities. [edited by Author]it_IT
dc.language.isoitit_IT
dc.publisherUniversita degli studi di Salernoit_IT
dc.subjectLibertà religiosait_IT
dc.subjectDissenting opinionit_IT
dc.subjectCorte di Strasburgoit_IT
dc.titleLe opinioni dissenzienti della Corte di Strasburgo e la tutela della libertà religiosa: un capovolgimento di prospettivait_IT
dc.typeDoctoral Thesisit_IT
dc.subject.miurIUS/11 DIRITTO CANONICO E DIRITTO ECCLESIASTICOit_IT
dc.contributor.coordinatoreFimiani, Filippoit_IT
dc.description.cicloXXXIIIit_IT
dc.contributor.tutorMacrì, Gianfrancoit_IT
dc.identifier.DipartimentoScienze politiche e della comunicazioneit_IT
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record