Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/2400
Title: In the Court(s) We Trust - A Procedural Solution to the Mutual Trust Dilemma
Authors: Düsterhaus, Dominik
Keywords: Mutual trust;Mutual recognition;Fundamental rights;Court of Justice;Urgent preliminary ruling procedure
Issue Date: 2017
Citation: Düsterhaus, D. “In the Court(s) We Trust - A Procedural Solution to the Mutual Trust Dilemma.” Freedom, Security & Justice: European Legal Studies 1 (2017): 26-44
Abstract: This paper scrutinizes the multi-faceted implementation of mutual trust and recognition in the EU’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice and suggests subjecting the operation of these principles to a stricter procedural framework. In order to conciliate respect for EU law with individual protection, national judges finding their obligation to give effect to mutual recognition to be incompatible with fundamental rights should defer the matter to the Court of Justice of the European Union for an urgent preliminary ruling (PPU).
URI: http://www.fsjeurostudies.eu
http://hdl.handle.net/10556/2400
http://dx.doi.org/10.14273/unisa-805
Appears in Collections:Freedom, Security & Justice: European Legal Studies (2017), n.1

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2017.1.FSJ_Dusterhaus_2.pdf2017.1.-FSJ_Dusterhaus_21,02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.