Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/2704
Title: Corte di giustizia e Corte Costituzionale alla ricerca di un nuovo, seppur precario, equilibio: i punti (relativamente) fermi, le questioni aperte e un paio di proposte per un ragionevole compromesso
Authors: Ruggeri, Antonio
Keywords: Relations between the Court of Justice and the Constitutional Court;Fixed points;Open questions;Perspectives;Judgment n. 269 of 2017
Issue Date: 2018
Citation: Ruggeri, A. "Corte di giustizia e Corte Costituzionale alla ricerca di un nuovo, seppur precario, equilibio: i punti (relativamente) fermi, le questioni aperte e un paio di proposte per un ragionevole compromesso." Freedom, Security & Justice: European Legal Studies 1 (2018): 7-26
Abstract: The study critically focuses on the most recent, divergent developments in the jurisprudence of the Italian Constitutional Court and of the Court of Justice of the EU, highlights the limits and shortcomings of the techniques for resolving antinomies (the one that relies on the mechanism of centralized constitutionality control as well as the one represented by the direct application of supranational law) and proposes some solutions aimed at containing (if not entirely eliminating) the risk of conflicts between the Courts’ judgments. The study concludes with a brief commentary on the complexity of the situation resulting from the joint allegation of violation by national laws of the Charter of the European Union, the ECHR and the Constitution.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10556/2704
http://dx.doi.org/10.26321/A.RUGGERI.01.2018.02
http://www.fsjeurostudies.eu/files/FSJ.2018.I.Ruggeri.2.pdf
ISSN: 2532-2079
Appears in Collections:Freedom, Security & Justice: European Legal Studies (2018), n.1

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FSJ.2018.I.Ruggeri.2.pdfFSJ.2018.I.Ruggeri.21,14 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.