Pensadores chakanas y contrastes en torno al pensamiento crítico (Fausto Reinaga y Manuel Quintín Lame)

Abstract

The present research article intends to be a contribution to the discussion about Critical Thinking, about its edges and folds, potentialities and limitations. For this, it takes with a qualitative methodology two forms that will be characterized as thoughts-others and contrasts them with the usual academic forms of critical thinking, which is usually theorized and revitalized in university environments and their places of influence. In a second moment I reflect on what of said critical thinking is present in the work of Fausto Reinaga and Manuel Quintín Lame and how we could consider the search for new tropes or places of enunciation taking advantage of the wealth of thinking of the “amauta” and the “ Indian who was educated in the jungles”.