Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/9179
Titolo: Assessing the Impact of A Community-Based Pro-Active Monitoring Program Addressing the need for Care of Community-Dwelling Citizens aged more than 80: Protocol for a Prospective Pragmatic Trial and Results of the Baseline Assessment
Autore: Liotta, Giuseppe
Madaro, Olga
Scarcella, Paola
Inzerilli, Maria Chiara
Frattini, B
Riccardi, Fabio
Accarino, N
Mancinelli, Sandro
Terracciano, Elisa
Orlando, Stefano
Marazzi, Maria Cristina
Parole chiave: Bio-psycho-social frailty;Functional Geriatric Evaluation;Hospital admission rate;Mortality;Social isolation
Data: 2020
Citazione: Liotta, G, Madaro, O, Scarcella, P, Inzerilli, MC, Frattini, B, Riccardi, F, Accarino, N, Mancinelli, S, Terracciano, E, Orlando, S, Marazzi, MC. (2020). Assessing the Impact of A Community-Based Pro-Active Monitoring Program Addressing the need for Care of Community-Dwelling Citizens aged more than 80: Protocol for a Prospective Pragmatic Trial and Results of the Baseline Assessment. Translational medicine @ UniSa 2020, 5: 22–27
Abstract: The aim of this paper is to describe the protocol of a study assessing the impact of a Communitybased pro-Active Monitoring Program, by measuring the effect in counteracting the adverse outcomes related to frailty. Methods: a prospective pragmatic trial will be carried out to describe the impact of an intervention on people aged>80, adjusted for relevant parameters: demographic variables, comorbidities, disability and bio-psycho-social frailty. They have been assessed with the Functional Geriatric Evaluation questionnaire that is a validated tool. Mortality, Acute Hospital Admission rates, Emergency Room Visit rates and Institutionalization rates are the main outcomes to be evaluated annually, over three years. Two groups of patients, made up by 578 cases (undergoing the intervention under study) and 607 controls have been enrolled and interviewed. Results: at baseline the two groups are quite similar for age, living arrangement, comorbidity, disability and cognitive status. They differ in education, economic resources and physical status (that are better in the control group) and in social resources (that is better in the case group). The latter was expected since the intervention is focused on increasing social capital at individual and community level and aimed at improving survival among the cases as well as reducing the recourse to hospital and residential Long Term Care. Conclusion: The proposed study addresses a crucial issue: assessing the impact of a bottom up care service consisting of social and health interventions aimed at reducing social isolation and improving access to health care services.
URI: https://www.translationalmedicine.unisa.it/index
http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/9179
https://doi.org/10.37825/2239-9747.1004
ISSN: 2239-9747
È visualizzato nelle collezioni:Translational Medicine @ UniSa. Volume 23 (sept. - dec. 2020)

File in questo documento:
File Descrizione DimensioniFormato 
Translational medicine @ UniSa 2020, 23 22–27.pdfTranslational medicine @ UniSa 2020, 23: 22–27312.69 kBAdobe PDFVisualizza/apri


Tutti i documenti archiviati in DSpace sono protetti da copyright. Tutti i diritti riservati.