dc.contributor.author | Düsterhaus, Dominik | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-07T11:26:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-04-07T11:26:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Düsterhaus, D. “In the Court(s) We Trust - A Procedural Solution to the Mutual Trust Dilemma.” Freedom, Security & Justice: European Legal Studies 1 (2017): 26-44 | it_IT |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.fsjeurostudies.eu | it_IT |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10556/2400 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.14273/unisa-805 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper scrutinizes the multi-faceted implementation of mutual trust
and recognition in the EU’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice and suggests
subjecting the operation of these principles to a stricter procedural framework. In
order to conciliate respect for EU law with individual protection, national judges
finding their obligation to give effect to mutual recognition to be incompatible with
fundamental rights should defer the matter to the Court of Justice of the European
Union for an urgent preliminary ruling (PPU). | it_IT |
dc.format.extent | P. 26-44 | it_IT |
dc.language.iso | en | it_IT |
dc.source | UniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneo | it_IT |
dc.subject | Mutual trust | it_IT |
dc.subject | Mutual recognition | it_IT |
dc.subject | Fundamental rights | it_IT |
dc.subject | Court of Justice | it_IT |
dc.subject | Urgent preliminary ruling procedure | it_IT |
dc.title | In the Court(s) We Trust - A Procedural Solution to the Mutual Trust Dilemma | it_IT |
dc.type | Article | it_IT |
dc.identifier.e-issn | 2532-2079 | it_IT |