Mostra i principali dati dell'item
In the Court(s) We Trust - A Procedural Solution to the Mutual Trust Dilemma
dc.contributor.author | Düsterhaus, Dominik | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-07T11:26:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-04-07T11:26:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Düsterhaus, D. “In the Court(s) We Trust - A Procedural Solution to the Mutual Trust Dilemma.” Freedom, Security & Justice: European Legal Studies 1 (2017): 26-44 | it_IT |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.fsjeurostudies.eu | it_IT |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10556/2400 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.14273/unisa-805 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper scrutinizes the multi-faceted implementation of mutual trust and recognition in the EU’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice and suggests subjecting the operation of these principles to a stricter procedural framework. In order to conciliate respect for EU law with individual protection, national judges finding their obligation to give effect to mutual recognition to be incompatible with fundamental rights should defer the matter to the Court of Justice of the European Union for an urgent preliminary ruling (PPU). | it_IT |
dc.format.extent | P. 26-44 | it_IT |
dc.language.iso | en | it_IT |
dc.source | UniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneo | it_IT |
dc.subject | Mutual trust | it_IT |
dc.subject | Mutual recognition | it_IT |
dc.subject | Fundamental rights | it_IT |
dc.subject | Court of Justice | it_IT |
dc.subject | Urgent preliminary ruling procedure | it_IT |
dc.title | In the Court(s) We Trust - A Procedural Solution to the Mutual Trust Dilemma | it_IT |
dc.type | Article | it_IT |
dc.identifier.e-issn | 2532-2079 | it_IT |