dc.contributor.author | De Gregorio, Cariso Marcello | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-16T14:18:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-16T14:18:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-08-02 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://elea.unisa.it:8080/xmlui/handle/10556/4242 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.14273/unisa-2448 | |
dc.description | 2017 - 2018 | it_IT |
dc.description | Tesi in cotutela internazionale con: Université Toulouse 2 « Jean Jaurès » École Doctorale Allph@ Ea 3051 - Équipe de recherche sur les rationalités philosophiques et les savoirs | |
dc.description.abstract | The research deals with ideology in general – and politics subjectivation in particular – as
read and explained by philosophers such as Althusser, Deleuze and Guattari (but also, inevitably,
passing through Spinoza, Marx, Lacan and Foucault).
The analysis is dealt with in the perspective of a better understanding of the processes that
lead to the birth and keeping (through its daily reproduction) of the State-Form as a Capture
Apparatus, concluding with some hypotheses – and very open investigative tracks (theoretical
and practical) – aimed at thinking about a social reorganization that attempts to design different
and more egalitarian scenarios of collective life.
The gaze focuses on the existence of a duplicity that now demands to be better articulated:
a) on the one hand, the obligation to understand the nature, the mechanisms of functioning and
the purpose of ideology as a practice of 'subjugation-through-subjectivation'; b) on the other
hand, the primarily political theme of the existence of individualities and collectivities – energies
and positions still collocated in the determined conjuncture – yet readables as an expression
of an active and inventive subjective presence, creative and not subjugated, capable of acting
and re-acting to the mechanisms of interpellation and 'shaping ad-hoc' implemented by the
apparatus of general signification of the productive system.
In a constant reference to the primary and secondary literature – and on this basis, by making
interpretations, analogies and connections of which every responsibility is evidently assumed
by the writer –, are here shown unexpected points of contact so far little identified
among the authors under exam. This is accomplished by examining their work as it unfolds, especially
as it evolves, expands and better specifies (this is the case of Althusser) with a different
semantics, which nevertheless reinterprets – in our reading – thesis and positions already
taken, making play (in a new form) categories already used in older studies, and therefore
never abandoned despite every “critical” reading that identifies only breakages and irreconcilable
coupures. In this way, we discover elements of closeness of Althusser's latest thesis with
the deleuzean and guattarian conception of the subject and of its ‘becoming’. [edited by Author] | it_IT |
dc.language.iso | it | it_IT |
dc.publisher | Universita degli studi di Salerno | it_IT |
dc.title | Riprodurre lo Stato. Superare lo Stato. Ideologia e soggettivazione politica in Louis Althusser, Gilles Deleuze e Félix Guattari | it_IT |
dc.type | Doctoral Thesis | it_IT |
dc.subject.miur | SPS/02 STORIA DELLE DOTTRINE POLITICHE | it_IT |
dc.contributor.coordinatore | Elia, Annibale | it_IT |
dc.description.ciclo | XXXI ciclo | it_IT |
dc.contributor.tutor | Raimondi, Fabio | it_IT |
dc.contributor.tutor | Sibertin-Blanc, Guillaume | it_IT |
dc.identifier.Dipartimento | Scienze Politiche, Sociali e della Comunicazione | it_IT |