| dcterms.contributor.author | Mastromarino, Anna <Università di Torino> | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-09T12:36:17Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-09T12:36:17Z | |
| dcterms.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dcterms.identifier.citation | Anna Mastromarino, Memoria, cancellazione, spazio pubblico, «Rivista di diritti comparati», n.1 (2024), pp. 1-20 | it_IT |
| dcterms.identifier.issn | 2532-6619 | it_IT |
| dcterms.identifier.uri | https://www.diritticomparati.it/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/01_Mastromarino.pdf | it_IT |
| dcterms.identifier.uri | http://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/7225 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Claims that are hastily classified as acts that want to erase history and
memory are actually an opportunity to reflect on our public space and public memory.
They run the risk of being instrumentalised by a kind of memorial populism that
deprives them of their communicative power. They do not, in fact, invite us to erase,
but rather to broaden our view on the past. Public authorities have the difficult task of
taking up the challenge, managing the conflict that these claims open up and proposing
paths of memorial re-semantisation and re-contextualisation. These actions, rather
than choosing between maintaining the status quo and removal, give space to a third
possibility: telling history and constructing memory with new words. More correct | it_IT |
| dcterms.format.extent | P. 1-20 | it_IT |
| dc.language.iso | it | it_IT |
| dcterms.source | UniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneo | it_IT |
| dcterms.subject | Cancel culture | it_IT |
| dcterms.subject | Public memory | it_IT |
| dcterms.subject | Democratic memory | it_IT |
| dcterms.subject | Public powers | it_IT |
| dcterms.subject | Re-semantisation | it_IT |
| dcterms.title | Memoria, cancellazione, spazio pubblico | it_IT |
| dcterms.type | Journal Article | it_IT |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal | Rivista di diritti comparati | it_IT |
