Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHughes, Heather <Lincoln University>
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-30T10:43:58Z
dc.date.available2024-09-30T10:43:58Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationHeather Hughes, Public Histories in South Africa: Between Contest and Reconciliation, Public History Review, 30 (2023), pp. 31–42it_IT
dc.identifier.issn1833-4989it_IT
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5130/phrj.v30i0.8374it_IT
dc.identifier.urihttp://elea.unisa.it/xmlui/handle/10556/7407
dc.description.abstractPublic history has long been practiced in South Africa, yet its content and purpose have always been deeply contested. In a deliberate, state-driven process, it has undergone extensive change since 1994, helping to redefine the nation in the post-apartheid era. There have been two principal means of achieving this goal: the first has been to commission a large number of new memory sites and the second has been to insist on a renovation of older sites, whose previous incarnation served the narrow interests of a small white minority. While clear new narratives have emerged, the process has witnessed continuing contests over representation and competing claims to the heritage estate.it_IT
dc.language.isoenit_IT
dc.publisherH. Hughes, Public Histories in South Africa: Between Contest and Reconciliation, Public History Review, 30 (2023), pp. 31–42it_IT
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0it_IT
dc.sourceUniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneoit_IT
dc.subjectLegacy projectit_IT
dc.subjectPost-apartheid memorial complexit_IT
dc.subjectStruggle narrativeit_IT
dc.subjectRehumanising heritageit_IT
dc.titlePublic Histories in South Africa: Between Contest and Reconciliationit_IT
dc.typeJournal Articleit_IT
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPublic History Reviewit_IT
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5130/phrj.v30i0.8374it_IT
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record