Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDüsterhaus, Dominik
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-07T11:26:14Z
dc.date.available2017-04-07T11:26:14Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationDüsterhaus, D. “In the Court(s) We Trust - A Procedural Solution to the Mutual Trust Dilemma.” Freedom, Security & Justice: European Legal Studies 1 (2017): 26-44it_IT
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.fsjeurostudies.euit_IT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10556/2400
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.14273/unisa-805
dc.description.abstractThis paper scrutinizes the multi-faceted implementation of mutual trust and recognition in the EU’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice and suggests subjecting the operation of these principles to a stricter procedural framework. In order to conciliate respect for EU law with individual protection, national judges finding their obligation to give effect to mutual recognition to be incompatible with fundamental rights should defer the matter to the Court of Justice of the European Union for an urgent preliminary ruling (PPU).it_IT
dc.format.extentP. 26-44it_IT
dc.language.isoenit_IT
dc.sourceUniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneoit_IT
dc.subjectMutual trustit_IT
dc.subjectMutual recognitionit_IT
dc.subjectFundamental rightsit_IT
dc.subjectCourt of Justiceit_IT
dc.subjectUrgent preliminary ruling procedureit_IT
dc.titleIn the Court(s) We Trust - A Procedural Solution to the Mutual Trust Dilemmait_IT
dc.typeArticleit_IT
dc.identifier.e-issn2532-2079it_IT
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record