dc.contributor.author | Ogheneruro Okpadah, Stephen | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-11T13:35:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-11T13:35:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ogheneruro Okpadah, Stephen. "The theatre of War and Counterculture in the dramaturgy of Ahmed Yerima." Sinestesieonline, A. 7, no. 24 (Ottobre 2018): 27-35 | it_IT |
dc.identifier.issn | 2280-6849 | it_IT |
dc.identifier.uri | http://sinestesieonline.it/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/ottobre2018-19.pdf | it_IT |
dc.identifier.uri | http://elea.unisa.it:8080/xmlui/handle/10556/3404 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.14273/unisa-1649 | |
dc.description.abstract | The call for authenticity and originality in the documentation of history has created a
counterbalance in historiography and culture. While the intellectual polemic between
historians such as Peter Ekeh and Bala Usman on the ownership of the oil in the Niger
Delta and which Nigerian ethnic group is superior to the other continue to pervade the
Nigerian historical landscape, playwrights such as Ahmed Yerima have resorted to
creating a new left in opposition to ideologies of older playwrights, and thereby creating
spaces for what this paper terms the Theatre of War. Consequently, we examine
Yerima’s ethnographic play, Abobaku as counterculture to Wole Soyinka’s Death and
the King’s Horseman. The research also investigate various dimensions to the theatre of
war in Nigerian dramaturgy. The study uses content analysis to explore the poetics of
counterculture in Yerima’s Abobaku. The paper is anchored upon Talcott Parson’s
theory of Counterculture, which is a tradition that poses itself in total opposition to a
dominant culture. It takes the values of the dominant culture and redefines them
negatively. Our study reveals that while Death and the King’s Horseman is rooted in the
advocacy for the ideo-aesthetic function of the Abobaku praxis, Yerima’s play, Abobaku
is a counterbalance to this praxis and recommends an abolishment of human ritual. This
paper concludes that although Yerima is critical of Soyinka’s positive stand on the
Ogunian motif and ritual scapegoatism, we must understand that the (Yerima’s)
liberation ideology in his ethnographic play, Abobaku, stands on the shoulders of the
giant (Soyinka). In other words, his dramaturgy is lifted up and borne aloft on the
gigantic stature of Soyinka’s theatre. We recommends that budding Nigerian
playwrights should endeavour to further examine the Abobaku motif in their works, to
facilitate a fully fledged discourse on human ritual and sacrifice in the Nigerian theatre
enterprise. | it_IT |
dc.format.extent | P. 27-35 | it_IT |
dc.language.iso | en | it_IT |
dc.publisher | Avellino : Associazione culturale Sinestesie | it_IT |
dc.source | UniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneo | it_IT |
dc.subject | Abobaku | it_IT |
dc.subject | Counterculture | it_IT |
dc.subject | Theatre of War | it_IT |
dc.subject | Dramaturgy | it_IT |
dc.subject | Tradition | it_IT |
dc.subject | Ahmed Yerima | it_IT |
dc.title | The theatre of War and Counterculture in the dramaturgy of Ahmed Yerima | it_IT |
dc.type | Journal Article | it_IT |