Show simple item record

dcterms.contributor.authorMaisto, Maria
dcterms.contributor.authorFerrante, Liborio
dcterms.contributor.authorGiribono, Anna Maria
dcterms.contributor.authorSodo, Maurizio
dcterms.contributor.authorPanagrosso, Marco
dcterms.contributor.authorPeluso, Andrea
dcterms.contributor.authorDel Guercio, Luca
dcterms.contributor.authorBracale, Umberto Marcello
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-01T09:34:16Z
dc.date.available2020-07-01T09:34:16Z
dcterms.date.issued2020
dcterms.identifier.citationMaisto M, Ferrante L, Giribono AM, Sodo M, Panagrosso M, Peluso A, del Guercio L, Bracale UM. Harmonic focus versus conventional electrocautery for femoral artery exposure: a "direct" comparison on the same patients. Translational Medicine @ UniSa 2020, 21(8): 27-30.it_IT
dcterms.identifier.issn2239-9747it_IT
dcterms.identifier.urihttp://www.translationalmedicine.unisa.it/indexit_IT
dcterms.identifier.urihttp://elea.unisa.it:8080/xmlui/handle/10556/4613
dcterms.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.14273/unisa-2805
dc.description.abstractSurgical access complications during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are reported relatively frequent. HARMONIC FOCUS® (HF; Ethicon EndoSurgery Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio, USA) is a device developed to improve bleeding control and reduce heat-related damage stemming from surgical preparation. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes and safety of HF versus conventional haemostasis with electrocautery, both techniques used in the same patient. Five patients developed bilateral wound’s thickening (13.9%) demonstrated at the CT scan, two of whom had no clinical manifestation while in three cases the thickening was associated with lymphocele (4.54%), 2 of which were in the side where the EC was used (5.5%), and 1 case (2.7%), in the HF applied side. One isolated lymphocele occurred at the left groin (2.7%) (tables n.2-3). A Fisher’s exact test was conducted between EC and HF on the occurrence of wound healing complications (3/36 for EC and 1/36 for HF) that resulted statistically significant at p<0.05. Focus Harmonic Scalpel has certain advantages than conventional haemostasis in avoiding surgical access complications.it_IT
dcterms.format.extentP. 27-30it_IT
dc.language.isoenit_IT
dcterms.sourceUniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneoit_IT
dcterms.subjectFocus Harmonic Scalpelit_IT
dcterms.subjectFemoral arteryit_IT
dcterms.subjectComplicationsit_IT
dcterms.subjectAbdominal aneurysmit_IT
dcterms.subjectEndovascular repairit_IT
dcterms.titleHarmonic focus versus conventional electrocautery for femoral artery exposure: a "direct" comparison on the same patientsit_IT
dcterms.typeArticleit_IT
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record