dc.contributor.author | Danieli, Diletta | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-15T11:59:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-09-15T11:59:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Danieli, D. "Jurisdiction in Contractual Matters under the Brussels Ia Regulation: Where do Mixed Contracts Stand?" Freedom, Security & Justice: European Legal Studies 2 (2017): 102-113 | it_IT |
dc.identifier.issn | 2532-2079 | it_IT |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.fsjeurostudies.eu/files/FSJ.2017.II.Danieli.6DEF.pdf | it_IT |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10556/2512 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.14273/unisa-912 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper addresses how the rules regarding jurisdiction in contractual
matters provided for in the Brussels Ia Regulation (having the same scope of the
previous Brussels I) may be applied to cases involving mixed contracts, which
encompass elements of a sale of goods, as well as of a provision of services, and are
not, as such, directly regulated by that legal instrument. On these grounds, the inquiry
takes into account the case law of both the Court of Justice of the European Union and
national courts that have been called upon to rule on similar instances. In light of the
above, an interpretative solution will be envisaged, also taking into account the
objective of predictability and proximity underlying the broader EU legislative
framework of cross-border litigation. | it_IT |
dc.format.extent | P. 102-113 | it_IT |
dc.language.iso | en | it_IT |
dc.source | UniSa. Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneo | it_IT |
dc.subject | Regulation No 1215/2012 (Brussels Ia) | it_IT |
dc.subject | Jurisdiction in contractual matters | it_IT |
dc.subject | Mixed contracts | it_IT |
dc.subject | CJEU case law | it_IT |
dc.subject | National case law | it_IT |
dc.title | Jurisdiction in Contractual Matters under the Brussels Ia Regulation: Where do Mixed Contracts Stand? | it_IT |
dc.type | Journal Article | it_IT |